Part 9.200 · Judicial Tenure Commission

Rule 9.245. Consent Agreements

Amended January 1, 2026 (current)

(A) Consent Agreements. At any time, the respondent and the disciplinary counsel (or the executive director acting as the putative disciplinary counsel) may enter into confidential negotiations. A consent agreement may

(1) include stipulated facts and an agreement as to the sanction; or

(2) include just the stipulated facts, with no agreement as to the sanction. The parties may present a signed consent agreement to the commission, which shall review the matter and decide whether to accept it. If the consent agreement is filed under subsection (1), the parties do not file briefs and the matter is not set on the docket for argument following the commission’s decision, unless otherwise directed by the Court. If the consent agreement is filed under subsection (2), the matter proceeds pursuant to MCR 9.250 and MCR 9.251.

(B) Commission Action. If the commission agrees to the terms set forth in the consent agreement in subsection (1), the commission shall issue a decision and recommendation as if there had been a neutral’s report filed. If the commission agrees to the terms set forth in the consent agreement in subsection (2), the stipulated facts serve in lieu of a neutral’s report and the matter then proceeds to a hearing before the commission, with the briefing schedule and an appearance before the commission, as set forth in MCR 9.240 and MCR 9.241. The time for filing a brief before the commission in matters filed under subsection (2) shall start with the filing of the consent agreement. A copy of the consent agreement shall be attached to the commission’s decision. The commission’s recommendation must include its rationale for accepting the consent agreement as well as a list of all respondent’s prior disciplinary actions under MCR 9.223(A)(2)-(5) or MCR 9.224 and must include an acknowledgment that the commission has included its consideration of any prior discipline in the commission’s recommended action. The list of previous disciplinary actions shall be submitted under seal and will be retained in a nonpublic manner. Disclosure of any prior disciplinary action will occur only if the information is relevant to any recommendation or imposed sanction.

(C) Prior or pending discipline actions. As part of a proposed consent agreement, the parties shall submit a list of all pending or previous disciplinary action taken against the respondent, sufficient information to understand the context of the individual circumstances, and the disposition of each incident. For purposes of this rule, “disciplinary actions” include any disposition other than a dismissal under MCR 9.223(A)(1), including nonsanctions under MCR 9.223(A)(2)-(5). The parties also shall include information about actions initiated against the respondent in proceedings other than disciplinary actions, including court cases for superintending control, criminal proceedings, internal discipline actions, or any other allegations of judicial misconduct. The list of previous disciplinary actions shall be submitted under seal and will be retained in a nonpublic manner. Disclosure of any prior disciplinary action will occur only if the information is relevant to any recommendation or imposed sanction.

(D) Action With Respondent’s Consent. With the consent of the respondent and the commission, the Supreme Court may impose a sanction or take other action at any stage of the proceedings under these rules.

(E) Confidentiality. A consent agreement submitted to the commission shall not be made public until after the commission has accepted its terms and the Court has approved it.